I was part of a small group today which judged the PRCA’s new Evaluation Category in their annual Awards Evaluation Category. So kudos to the PRCA for helping AMEC put programme measurement on the PR Agenda in the UK.
What was good to see was the high level of entry interest in the new category which was designed to show…..”That the PR team and its campaigns are making a significant contribution to the organisation.” Specifically the emphasis was on outcomes rather than outputs.
What I saw was great work. Period. But what I wanted to see was more entries which started with clear and measurable objectives. Instead I found myself reflecting, "why do PR consultancies ignore best practice and insist on listing tactics, rather than objectives against which they expect to be judged by their client." It reminded me that the first of the Barcelona Principles emphasized the importance of goal setting and measurement.
In my experience, in PR consultancy and within AMEC, the most successful award-winning agencies get that reputation because they take it seriously. They have at least a dedicated person, usually a small team, who act as the final arbiter/litmus test/hard man and sign off on all consultancy award entries. I remember working for a top 5 consultancy in New Year at the turn of the Millenium and thinking, "how can any one beat Ketchum. They had the formula. They had the insistence on great work. Or, put another way, it clearly did not get entered.
What organised Consultancy Awards Teams are looking for is:
- Consistency in the consultancy entry approach;
- There is a common language and lay-out in award entries from campaign to campaign, e.g. Objectives does not suddenly become Tactics in one entry! What was perhaps surprising to see, even from large consultancies, was that there was so much variation entry to entry.
- An appreciation of what external judges look for.
One of the best entries we saw today was from a consultancy which unsurprisingly got the total attention of the judges. How? What they did was literally lay out the Objectives side by side with the Results. It was effective presentation which showed the judges at a glance how they had delivered against their programme promise/objective. It was that logical. That clear. And they deserved to be shortlisted.
What professionals in the UK can expect is for PRCA to run training sessions to show younger PR professionals how to write SMART objectives. Professor Tom Watson, Professor of Public Relations, Bournemouth University, UK, laid down the ground rules at the European Summit presented by AMEC and the IPR in Lisbon this year. He said, simply but clearly: “You cannot underestimate the important of goal setting and objectives and of course it is linked to the Barcelona Principles.”
Based on today’s judging, AMEC will commit to develop- an international webinar “teach in” to share tips like this ahead of the Call for Entries for the AMEC Awards (Sept 19). 2012 is a big year for the AMEC Awards. If everyone gets behind it. 2012 is the year it goes truly international to show best practice. More about this soon with the Call for Entries due on September 19.
Recent Comments